The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power 
George Will called it the "most significant public policy book this year," and he's not far wrong. For friends and fans of limited government, Mr. Healy's argument is time honored: the presidency as it stands today is unconstitutional, and it's our own damn fault.What Mr. Healy adds is a sardonic, and incisive post-holed history of the office. He breaks the presidency down into a few periods, and combines it with public opinion sentiments of the age. The result is an alarming history of the
Gene Healy is a very clever yet straightforward writer and did very good research for this book which does a good job explaining why we need a less powerful chief executive. However, he devotes to much space to talking about foreign policy and wars and almost no space to domestic affairs- which are much more important to most American voters. His "Cult" in the book consists primarily of scholars and writers for relatively intellectual outlets like The New Republic, The Weekly Standard, etc.-

I found the concept of The Cult of the Presidency to be more appealing than its application in this book. I was hoping for a theory or framework to be explored rather than another book on the historical/political effects of the US foreign and domestic applications of power.
Every four years, men and women with permanently-fixed smiles assure us that they will end corruption in Washington, get the economy moving, and end our trouble overseas, if only we will elect them President. The claims are bold who could budge the vast federal bureaucracy or find a solution to the hornets nest that is the middle east? Yet a third of the American public seems willing to believe these and greater claims, from across the political spectrum. Throughout the 20th century, the
Libertarian take on how and why executive power has expanded since the Founding Fathers and why it's not a good thing.
Gene Healy
Hardcover | Pages: 367 pages Rating: 4.19 | 139 Users | 25 Reviews

List Based On Books The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power
| Title | : | The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power |
| Author | : | Gene Healy |
| Book Format | : | Hardcover |
| Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 367 pages |
| Published | : | April 1st 2008 by Cato Institute |
| Categories | : | Politics. History. Law. Nonfiction |
Explanation As Books The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power
The Bush years have justifiably given rise to fears of a new Imperial Presidency. Yet despite the controversy surrounding the administration's expansive claims of executive power, both Left and Right agree on the boundless nature of presidential responsibility. The Imperial Presidency is the price we seem to be willingly and dangerously agreeable to pay the office the focus of our national hopes and dreams. Interweaving historical scholarship, legal analysis, and cultural commentary, The Cult of the Presidency argues that the Presidency needs to be reined in, its powers checked and supervised, and its wartime authority put back under the oversight of the Congress and the courts. Only then will we begin to return the Presidency to its proper constitutionally limited role.Details Books In Pursuance Of The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power
| Original Title: | The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Presidential Power |
| ISBN: | 1933995157 (ISBN13: 9781933995151) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Rating Based On Books The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power
Ratings: 4.19 From 139 Users | 25 ReviewsWrite Up Based On Books The Cult of the Presidency: America's Dangerous Devotion to Executive Power
Highly recommended attack on excessive Presidential power that should be read by every American. Healy suggests that the cynicism about government that marked American life in the 1970s was not something that needed to be "healed" but rather a healthy trend. As someone whose sociopolitical views were formed in that era I really couldn't agree more. Healy also poses a legitimate, too rarely asked question: What kind of person would want to be President? (Answer: the very type of person who'llGeorge Will called it the "most significant public policy book this year," and he's not far wrong. For friends and fans of limited government, Mr. Healy's argument is time honored: the presidency as it stands today is unconstitutional, and it's our own damn fault.What Mr. Healy adds is a sardonic, and incisive post-holed history of the office. He breaks the presidency down into a few periods, and combines it with public opinion sentiments of the age. The result is an alarming history of the
Gene Healy is a very clever yet straightforward writer and did very good research for this book which does a good job explaining why we need a less powerful chief executive. However, he devotes to much space to talking about foreign policy and wars and almost no space to domestic affairs- which are much more important to most American voters. His "Cult" in the book consists primarily of scholars and writers for relatively intellectual outlets like The New Republic, The Weekly Standard, etc.-

I found the concept of The Cult of the Presidency to be more appealing than its application in this book. I was hoping for a theory or framework to be explored rather than another book on the historical/political effects of the US foreign and domestic applications of power.
Every four years, men and women with permanently-fixed smiles assure us that they will end corruption in Washington, get the economy moving, and end our trouble overseas, if only we will elect them President. The claims are bold who could budge the vast federal bureaucracy or find a solution to the hornets nest that is the middle east? Yet a third of the American public seems willing to believe these and greater claims, from across the political spectrum. Throughout the 20th century, the
Libertarian take on how and why executive power has expanded since the Founding Fathers and why it's not a good thing.


0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.