Olaf Stapledon
Paperback | Pages: 272 pages Rating: 3.93 | 6211 Users | 502 Reviews
Identify Books During Star Maker
| Original Title: | Star Maker |
| ISBN: | 1857988078 (ISBN13: 9781857988079) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Narration Toward Books Star Maker
Star Maker is a science fiction novel by Olaf Stapledon, published in 1937. The book describes a history of life in the universe, dwarfing in scale Stapledon's previous book, Last and First Men (1930), a history of the human species over two billion years. Star Maker tackles philosophical themes such as the essence of life, of birth, decay and death, and the relationship between creation and creator. A pervading theme is that of progressive unity within and between different civilizations. Some of the elements and themes briefly discussed prefigure later fiction concerning genetic engineering and alien life forms. Arthur C. Clarke considered Star Maker to be one of the finest works of science fiction ever written.Itemize Epithetical Books Star Maker
| Title | : | Star Maker |
| Author | : | Olaf Stapledon |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | SF Masterworks |
| Pages | : | Pages: 272 pages |
| Published | : | November 11th 1999 by Millennium Paperbacks (first published 1937) |
| Categories | : | Science Fiction. Fiction. Philosophy. Classics |
Rating Epithetical Books Star Maker
Ratings: 3.93 From 6211 Users | 502 ReviewsDiscuss Epithetical Books Star Maker
Wow. Just wow. This novel disproves the general assumption that golden age SF is either hokey or unscientific.In fact, it starts out like a strong hard-SF exploration novel touching on many possible alien races, mindsets, and physiologies, but it dives right down the rabbit hole into vast combined telepathic minds, galactic societies that actually are GALACTIC in scale, telepathic communication with multiple galaxies, and even to the discovery the rich stellar intelligence. That's right.Star Maker must have been at least a little old-fashioned even when it was published in 1937. Stapledon uses the framing technique of Eddison and others, very much like Hodgson in The House on the Borderland to tell the story of a man who travels the cosmos by intellect alone. It is also more Wells than Wells in its didacticism. There isnt much of a story here; its a journey of observation, explaining how the universe works, from the microscopic level to the divine.Despite it being basically a
Last and First Men hurt, but I'm back for more. And Stapledon continues to run with his vast future history, now encompassing the universe. It repeats the original structure, with a series of specific, detailed histories that eventually generalize and summarize, pulling back to show the entire grand scope. And in so doing, dares to slot the events of Last and First Men--the entirety of broadly-defined humanity's existence--as less than a footnote, never having joined galactic society and being
This novel has many great and fascinating ideas in it about the nature of life, the universe, and everything. Far, far too many ideas. Many of the ideas are still being talked about in modern cosmology. But with a few exceptions (e.g. expanding universe) there is little evidence for any of them.Fascinating in small doses. Pretty tough to get through the whole thing.Easier to read than Eureka: A Prose Poem by Edgar Allan Poe, but that's not saying much!
This is a SF novel from 1937, it shows a way the genre could have gone. It is like a dinosaur, it is great in some aspects and modern animal can go green with envy for their advantages but ultimately it was unfit, so the evolution done its deed.The story follows the narrators journey through the space and time of the universe. It can be split into five major parts:Part one, the physical universe. The narrator (soul?) goes from the Earth and travels across the galaxy. He sees different stars and
reviews.metaphorosis.com 3.5 stars A man suddenly acquires the power to travel mentally throughout all dimensions of the universe, from creation to conclusion. He traces the development of many kinds of life while seeking signs of a postulated creative force. This is possibly the dullest interesting book I've read, or vice versa. It's seldom that it takes me this long to complete a book (even the dread Alexandria Quartet felt faster), and it could almost be said of this novel that I "couldn't
Have had to finally admit defeat on this one. perhaps i shall return to it at some point, I know i put Jude the obscure aside when I was about 20 and then took it up again and read it about 15 years later. the problem with that scenario would be the sneakiest suspicion that 15 years would take me way past any interest I would have in completing a novel i find totally porridge-like in its stodginess. I think it might be one to launch myself at when there is nothing else to read in reach but I
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.